My friends in Redmond reminded me that SharePoint just celebrated its 10th birthday on March 25th.  (They had a big party.  I’m sure my invitation got lost in the mail.)

This may not seem all that important to Records and Information Management professionals, but I think it is.  Ten years is not that long for an application platform to be around.  And you have to admire the advancements that SharePoint has made over the last decade – especially with respect to Enterprise Content and Records Management functionality. 

Couple that with SharePoint’s remarkable sales growth and its steady march toward ECRM market dominance and I think you can be comfortable with any decision you make about dropping your older, more established (and likely more expensive) legacy ECRM solution. 

I’m just saying…

It recently occurred to me that there seems to be some level of confusion around how a few fundamental SharePoint records management terms are defined.  This confusion may very well cause people challenges when trying to understand how SharePoint manages records and information. 

With that in mind, I’ve compiled a short list of terms I consider essential to understanding SharePoint records management.  Please keep in mind, these terms are defined from a Records and Information Management perspective and may have slightly different meanings within other context.  As usual, comments, additions and corrections are strongly encouraged.  

Record  

Record’ is easily the most misunderstood word in Enterprise Content Management.  There are essentially two very different types definitions for ‘Record’.  One type I call the ‘organizational’ definition – meaning the organization is responsible for determining what type of information it considers an official ‘record’.  These descriptions are based on the content and context of the material, rather than the its format.  For this reason, an email from a customer that says the customer has accepted the organization’s proposal would typically be considered a record, and should be managed as such.  An email from your buddy verifying your tee time would not.

But SharePoint is not concerned with the content or the context of a record.  In SharePoint, a record is any piece of information that is subject to organizational business rules that require it to be rendered immutable and assigned a retention period.   This is the second type of definition for ‘Record’, which I call the ‘functional’ definition. 

A record in MOSS 07 resides in the Records Center.  In SharePoint 2010, Records In Place functionality allows you to declare a record anywhere in your site collection. 

Document  

I’m speaking in broad terms here, so please bear with me.  In SharePoint a document is any unstructured content that has not been declared a record. Generally speaking, there are no rules preventing documents from being modified or deleted.  Documents can be spreadsheets, images, emails or any other piece of electronically stored information that resides in SharePoint.

File Plan

A classification scheme in the SharePoint Records Center used to categorize a record based on its security and retention and disposition requirements.  SharePoint uses the File Plan to apply an organization’s official retention schedule.  (Though, to be clear, expiration policies can be applied to material outside of the Records Center, as well.)

A typical file plan in a SharePoint implementation might include a Records Center Library for all Human Resources records.  The Human Resources Library may contain a folder called ‘Medical Benefits’.  This folder may have multiple subfolders for each employee in the organization.  A signed medical benefits agreement for John Smith would be classified into the file plan under Human Resources > Medical Benefits > Smith, John. 

Appropriate permissions would be applied throughout the file plan and, in SharePoint 2010, different retention requirements could be applied at each file plan level, as necessary.

Content Type 

Broadly speaking, a Content Type is a reusable collection of settings that apply to a specific set of SharePoint content.  Content Types are designed to help organize SharePoint content in meaningful ways.  Content Types allow you manage document metadata and behavior in a centralized and reusable manner.

In records management terms, Content Types loosely parallel a Record Series, such as ‘Expense Report’ or ‘Annual Review’.   In MOSS 07, Content Types determine where a record is classified in the file plan.  In SharePoint 2010, record classification is determined by a combination of Content Type and user designated metadata values.

This month marks the end of our second year of providing a ridiculous amount of information about an extremely narrow subject to a very limited number of people – making us unquestionably the number one island-themed SharePoint Records and Information Management blog on the internet.  We just want to take a brief moment to wish ourselves a happy birthday and thank you all for following along.

Mike Alsup has been a recognized thought leader in the ECM/RM field since before it was actually considered a ‘field’.  Over the years, Mike (and the companies he has founded) did some groundbreaking consulting work with virtually all of the major content management applications on the market.  Like most industry visionaries, Mike recognizes the significant impact SharePoint is making across every sector of the business landscape.  Mike also understands the important role records management plays in an enterprise SharePoint implementation. 

Mike recently put together an excellent slide presentation on SharePoint records management best practices and methodologies and made it available on the web.  I highly recommend walking through these slides if you are currently using SharePoint or plan to deploy it in the future.  You can find the slides here.  Take particular note of some of the best practices Mike discusses that I’ve also mentioned in previous posts, such as site provisioning, master site templates and Enterprise Information Lifecycle Management.

First BirthdayWe just want to take a quick moment to pat ourselves on the back.  The SharePoint Records Management blog just passed its first birthday.  That means for over a hundredth of a century we have provided a ridiculous amount of information about an extremely narrow subject to a very limited number of people.  We couldn’t have done it without you, our loyal readers.  We’d like to personally thank you both.

« Previous PageNext Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 61 other followers